Advertisement

Politics Members only

IN DATA: Did foreign voters lose the election for Sweden's right-wing government?

Richard Orange
Richard Orange - richard.orange@thelocal.com
IN DATA: Did foreign voters lose the election for Sweden's right-wing government?
Left Party leader Nooshi Dadgostar went to vote in advance in Rinkeby, a majority immigrant district in Stockholm. Photo: Fredrik Sandberg/TT
Add The Local as a preferred source

Senior politicians for the far-right Sweden Democrats have reacted to the party's poor election result by blaming immigrant voters and newly naturalised Swedish citizens voting for the first time. Is there any truth to this?

Become a member or log in to continue reading

More

Comments (5)

Join the conversation in our comments section below. Share your own views and experience and if you have a question or suggestion for our journalists then email us at news@thelocal.com.
Please keep comments civil, constructive and on topic – and make sure to read our terms of use before getting involved.

Please log in to leave a comment.

All comments 5
Sort by
anonymous
I would like to second the previous commenter's view. Articles like this give oxygen to these ethnonationalistic arguments. Perhaps you think it is important to rebut or publish this information for the benefit of your readers, but If the SD had argued that women voters cost them the election, would you have published an article that broke down the detailed statistics of women voters and their potential preferences and impacts to illustrate whether that was true?
  • Hi! I think we would actually, if SD, or some anti-feminist party, were to make such a weird claim. This is a look at the data rather than an opinion piece. Even so, in the article we point out that the same argument would go for women, city dwellers and many other categories of voter. We also have an opinion piece by Mandy Piper makes exactly your point, which you can find here.
KL
Typical SD throwing their dummies from the pram and not taking any responsibility for how they treat people! In a nut shell, SD have also shown why they really want to stop new citizen applications. Gerrymandering! They want to rig the elections in their favour.
The Irony
I think it is dangerous for either side (SD but also S) to engage in this kind of discussion as it normalises the idea that there are different classes of citizenship - "original and native born" citizens and "immigrant" citizens. Where does this kind of reasoning then stop? Will second generation immigrants who have been born in Sweden also be a future category? Or third? SD alway complains that citizenship is given away too easily and cheaply, yet they are eroding the value of citizenship by creating artificial tiers of citizenship that have no basis in law. It is sad to see S join in this discussion on the very day that they are also proclaiming a new era in Sweden for those 'who have not felt welcome' - quashing the idea that there are different types of citizens would be a good start!

See Also