Advertisement

Sweden Democrats accused of cheating to block transitional rules for citizenship

Richard Orange
Richard Orange - richard.orange@thelocal.com
Sweden Democrats accused of cheating to block transitional rules for citizenship
Green Party MP Annika Hirvonen said that she would raise the issue of the Sweden Democrats' breaking pairing protocol to group leaders of the other parties. Photo: Fredrik Sandberg/TT

The far-right Sweden Democrat party blocked an opposition proposal to add transitional rules to the citizenship law, by sending two MPs to vote that it had agreed would be absent, The Local reveals.

The motion was defeated by one vote on Wednesday, despite the opposition managing to convince two former Sweden Democrat MPs to vote in their favour. 

After the defeat, Green MP Annika Hirvonen, who was one of the driving forces behind the motion, accused the Sweden Democrats of breaking long-established parliamentary protocol on 'pairing off' to win the vote.

"They sent in two people to manipulate the outcome," she told The Local. "This has never happened before... it doesn't look like anything else than conscious manipulation of the result."

She said that the Sweden Democrats' unprecedented breaking of the pairing agreement would have to have "consequences".

"We will need to discuss how we are going to proceed, because after this kind of breach of trust, we can't continue as if nothing has happened. A reasonable thing to do, of course, would be to take the initiative to put this issue to a new vote."

Hirvonen said the two MPs who were supposed to have been absent were Charlotte Quensel and Michael Rubbestad. According to the voting lists, the pair were absent for the main vote on the citizenship bill but present for the vote on transitional rules, which took place just a few seconds later.

Advertisement

Sweden's parties have a long-standing pairing system, called kvittning, where parties agree to hold back MPs from voting to balance out MPs from the opposing side who are sick or who have other engagements. The Sweden Democrats were barred from participating in the arrangement for their first ten years in the parliament, as they were not seen as a mature party. They were only allowed to participate in 2021. 

When contacted by The Local, the Sweden Democrats acknowledged that they had sent two MPs who were on the agreed list of non-voting MPs to vote against the opposition motion, ensuring its defeat. 

Linda Lindberg, the party's group leader, said that the move had been necessary to prevent "drama-seeking independent MPs" from upsetting the system. 

"The people have voted for the Tidö majority and as a result as voters, you should also be able to expect that our policies become reality, regardless of whether there are a couple of power-seeking independents taking our seats in the chamber," she said. "Important legislation must be allowed to take precedence over the influence of independents and the system of pairing off, which is why I ensured that this particular individual vote was voted through."

Advertisement

Hirvonen said she hoped now to talk to the group leaders of the other parliamentary parties to see if the vote could be held again, meaning there is still a small chance of transitional arrangements being added to the bill. 

"I will talk to the other parties' group leaders. We made this agreement together, all of us," she said. The Sweden Democrats' failure to respect it, she added, showed that they were not a normal, mature party. 

"They are not. If a handshake where you agree on something cannot be trusted, then what can be trusted with them?"

Elsa Widding, one of the two former Sweden Democrat MPs who had decided to vote for the transitional arrangements, said that what the Sweden Democrats had done amounted to cheating. 

"They kind of cheated the system to get this through, otherwise the opposition would have won and there would have been transitional rules," she told The Local. "Instead, it’s going to be complete chaos." 

Advertisement

The Moderate Party, which relies on Sweden Democrat support to be in government, refused to comment on the Sweden Democrats' break with protocol. 

"I can only speak for the Moderate Party's parliamentary group and we stick to the agreement on pairing off we have with the Social Democrats," Mattias Karlsson, the party's group leader, told The Local. "Other parties speak for themselves about what they choose to do. I believe all of us group leaders need to meet to discuss the pairing system." 

Given that the Säpo security police had called for transitional rules to be avoided, he added, the Social Democrats also had questions to answer. 

"The Social Democrats were prepared to put Sweden’s security to one side and form a majority together with Left Party, Green Party, Centre Party and two independents in order to pursue a more relaxed migration policy. That is something one should also have opinions about."

When the Local asked Hirvonen how she felt about the Sweden Democrats' reneging on decades of parliamentary tradition, she said her feelings did not matter as she was not one of those directly affected. 

"It's not about me. It's about all the people, these almost 102,000 people, who have been waiting for a long time and who are now going to be thrust into insecurity by even longer waiting times. They [the queues] will explode, of course, because no one has prepared for these procedures, for these tests, no one knows when they are even coming or how they will look, so I feel sorry for all these people." 

More

Comments (23)

Join the conversation in our comments section below. Share your own views and experience and if you have a question or suggestion for our journalists then email us at news@thelocal.com.
Please keep comments civil, constructive and on topic – and make sure to read our terms of use before getting involved.

Please log in to leave a comment.

All comments 23
Sort by
MA
Hey Linda, did you forget to add "THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER" to the end?
Mehari
Through the lense of a laymans under standing this is that I supposed happened. The SD breached the internal agreement by sending their two MPs who were not supposed to vote when the opposition seem to think that they would act acvordingly. And we are now saying on the swedish parliament where laws are written and ratified for the whole nation to follow, one party can say sth and do the opposite, or basically LIE with the outcome to deny 100000 of peoples who abided by the existing law - and we are supposed to believe that it is democratically passed new law of the Land. Its okej to basically LIE!!!! God have Mercy!!!
unsurprised
I don't know how Swedish politics works internally but in the US we call this political theater. The outcome is typically already predetermined by the major players on both sides. Then they show up and pretend to vote and fight over results so the public would have the illusion democracy still exists. If Sweden is following to footsteps of the US, which I suspect it has, then this outcome is not at all a surprise. The Tidö government and the opposition, namely Social Democrats, Center and Left already hand shook before the vote took place. The Greens and the independents might have been blind sided as they were not the major players and therefore not part of the club. You can probably see this through how each party reacted afterwards. Only Greens spoke up. Left and Social Democrats would have been very vocal about it immediately if it was a total surprise to them. And our PM doesn't have any spine as always.
ML
Because they did cheat. This kind of nonsense happens in the US government all the time too from both major US parties to get what they want. It's deeply unpopular but it keeps happening
Anonymous
It's kinda (darkly) funny that some Swedish lawmakers finally got a taste of what it feels like to have the long-established rules changed mid-game because hey, things were assumed based on trust and there was no precise law forbidding the switch. Hopefully, that amounts to something - if not a righting of the wrong, atleast a healthy distrust of the untrustworthy. Outcomes aside, hats off to the effort put in by the Fair Transition team to make immigrant voices heard and accomplish far beyond the chances anyone expected for the transition amendment. Even if not in practical terms, you folks actually won against crazy odds by recruiting enough supporting votes, and the other side had to plan on turning the tables in order to win.

See Also