Candidate barred from standing in German local election challenges removal of Brits’ EU rights

A British candidate rejected from standing in the Berlin local elections is challenging the decision in court, saying he still has EU citizenship after Brexit.

Candidate barred from standing in German local election challenges removal of Brits' EU rights
Matt Bristow placing political posters up on the Berlin campaign trail recently. Photo courtesy of Matt Bristow

When UK national and German resident Matt Bristow stood as a candidate for Volt Deutschland in the Berlin borough of Pankow, the state electoral commission ruled he wasn’t allowed because he doesn’t have the citizenship of a Member State of the EU after the UK left the bloc.

Under Germany’s election laws, EU citizens living in Germany can vote and stand in the district assembly elections, which are taking place on September 26th this year.

Bristow – with the support of his legal team, EU lawyer Dr Alexandra von Westernhagen and constitutional lawyer Michael Plöse – this week filed an appeal with the Berlin constitutional court against this decision in urgent proceedings.

The 36-year-old – backed by his pro-European party Volt – believes he is still an EU citizen and therefore should be able to exercise the right to stand in a German local election.

VIDEO: What Brits in Germany need to know about residency after Brexit

According to EU law, Bristow, who has lived in Berlin with some gaps since 2006, only needs to be an EU citizen in order to be able to stand in local elections. In the party’s view, this status is not the same as having the citizenship of an EU member state.

Citing EU law, Volt said in a press release that “EU citizenship is an independent status: it is additional to national citizenship and does not replace it. This is consistent with the opinion of a number of experts in EU law from various EU member states.”

Bristow, who is also a citizens’ rights campaigner for British in Germany, told The Local: “Once an EU citizen always an EU citizen, regardless of what happens in the country of origin – and the only way for such a fundamental individual right to be lost is if there is due process with an individual hearing. If you look at other fundamental EU rights, that’s the way the EU system works.

“You can’t just suddenly remove rights from people in that way. So we’re not arguing that British citizens who’ve been born in the past 18 months are EU citizens, we’re saying it’s clear that they’re not. Because they were born after the UK left the EU.

“We’re saying anyone who was a UK citizen up until the 31st of January 2020 would have automatically become an EU citizen, and therefore still is an EU citizen.”

READ ALSO: How Brits can prove their post-Brexit rights in Germany before they get their residency card

What does EU citizenship actually mean? Photo: picture alliance/dpa/dpa-Zentralbild | Jens Kalaene

Although similar cases have arisen, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in Luxembourg has so far not ruled explicitly on this point. There’s a possibility that Berlin will refer this question onto the ECJ.

A ruling in favour of this stand point would have massive implications for Britons both at home and abroad. 

Bristow said he has always maintained that he is an EU citizen – and that’s why he stood in the district elections.

“I’ve understood that the authorities have taken a different view to whether or not I’m eligible for the election,” he said. “But because it’s such an important issue, I have thought throughout that this does need to go to the ECJ to have this question settled once and for all.”

Alexandra von Westernhagen, who, together with Professor Joshua Silver as the lead plaintiff, initiated a similar case from the UK in April 2020 that is currently before the ECJ, said: “Having been conferred, EU citizenship is a fundamental, individual right, which according to applicable EU law as well as the European Human Rights Convention cannot be removed without any due process. EU citizenship therefore is not automatically lost when the country of origin leaves the Union.”

Paul Loeper, Co-Chair of Volt Deutschland said: “We unequivocally criticise the exclusion of Matt Bristow from our electoral list on the basis of his British nationality. We regard this decision as being incompatible with EU law. We therefore explicitly support Bristow’s appeal against the decision of the state electoral commission.”

READ ALSO: Everything you need to know about Berlin’s ‘super election day’

What does EU citizenship mean for EU citizens?

Although Bristow’s case is about standing as a candidate in a local election, other rights such as voting, freedom of movement and getting support from EU embassies while abroad are also linked to holding EU citizenship. 

“There are a whole other range of rights connected to EU citizenship which millions of people are reliant on. I think it’s broader than just the 66 million UK citizens, although clearly it’s partly about them,” said Bristow. 

“It’s also about hundreds of millions of EU citizens in general to really understand – what does the status of EU citizenship mean?

“Is it really worth the paper it’s written on? Or is it a kind-of PR stunt, is it no more than national citizenship or does it actually have its individual status and rights. And is the EU prepared to stand up for its citizens? That’s the crux of the issue.”

Bristow reiterated that this question is not simply a Brexit topic.

“This is a European Union issue, and it’s about the relationship between the EU and it’s own citizens and I think that’s a really important point.”

Member comments

  1. I await with bated breath to see the outcome…. but I doubt it will be in favour of U.K. (former) EU citizens. Our rights and status have been unilaterally removed

    1. That’s the key – “unilaterally removed” without due process or right of appeal and without any consideration for individual circumstances

  2. There are about 1.2 million UK citizens living in the EU, which makes us a larger population than Cyprus, Luxembourg and Malta. Larger, in fact, that the two smallest states put together.
    I agree with Matt Bristow, we have been disenfranchised by the electoral system in the UK and if we cannot vote in our adoptive countries, then anyone refusing to let us vote is clearly acting in an undemocratic way and contrary to the EU’s fundamental ethos.

  3. I have been living in France since 1987, got married to local woman from Rennes, had our daughter in the 90’s , initially I got the carte de séjour in 1988 renewed it in 1998 then in the early 2000’s it was no longer needed, then came Brexit , I eventually changed the one from 1998 for the new 2021 one, which gives full rights in France and the EU, same as I had pre Brexit, but, I have only ever been allowed to vote in local and regional elections , with the new card I’ve been given permanent residence, ‘séjour permanent’, but still not able to vote in the Presidential elections, but I have been offered French citizenship which I so far have not accepted .Things are the same as pre Brexit.

  4. Maybe Brits should pin their hopes on German parties voting to allow less restrictive rules on dual nationality. i.e. to allow the other nationality to be non-EU. SPD, Greens and FDP offer some encouragment of this in their manifestos, though I guess it is more aimed at allowing second generation children of Turkish and others to retain the nationality of their parents.

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.


Ex-chancellor Schröder sues German Bundestag for removing perks

Former Chancellor Gerhard Schröder has sued the German parliament for removing some of his official post-retirement perks over his links to Russian energy giants, his lawyer said Friday.

Ex-chancellor Schröder sues German Bundestag for removing perks

Schröder, 78, has come under heavy criticism for his proximity to Russian President Vladimir Putin and involvement with state-backed energy companies.

The decision to suspend Schröder’s taxpayer-funded office and staff in May was “contrary to the rule of law”, Michael Nagel, told public broadcaster NDR.

Schröder “heard of everything through the media”, Nagel said, noting that the Social Democrat had asked for a hearing before the budget committee responsible but was not given the chance to express himself.

READ ALSO: Germany strips Schröder of official perks over Russia ties

Schröder’s lawyers filed the complaint with an administrative Berlin court, a spokesman for the court confirmed.

In its decision to strip him of the perks, the committee concluded that Schröder, who served as chancellor from 1998 to 2005, “no longer upholds the continuing obligations of his office”.

Most of Schröder’s office staff had already quit before the final ruling was made.

Despite resigning from the board of Russian oil company Rosneft and turning down a post on the supervisory board of gas giant Gazprom in May, Schröder has maintained close ties with the Kremlin.

The former chancellor met Putin in July, after which he said Moscow was ready for a “negotiated solution” to the war in Ukraine — comments branded as “disgusting” by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

Last week, the Social Democrats concluded that Schröder would be allowed to remain a member after he was found not have breached party rules over his ties to the Russian President.

Schröder’s stance on the war and solo diplomacy has made him an embarrassment to the SPD, which is also the party of current Chancellor Olaf Scholz.