Accusers 'relieved' over Assange ruling: lawyer
Two women who accused Julian Assange of rape and sexual assault are "relieved" by a London court ruling Wednesday ordering the WikiLeaks founder's extradition to Sweden for questioning, their lawyer said.
"They feel a certain degree of relief," lawyer Claes Borgström told the TT news agency shortly after Assange lost a bitter legal battle to block his extradition to Sweden.
"It has been very trying for them to live with this uncertainty, especially since they themselves have found themselves attacked," he said, referring to allegations spread especially on social media that the women's accusations were motivated by secret agendas aimed at bringing down WikiLeaks.
Two judges at the High Court in London rejected Wednesday arguments by the 40-year-old Australian, whose anti-secrecy website has enraged governments around the world, that his extradition would be unlawful.
Swedish prosecutors want to question Assange on suspicion of two counts of sexual molestation and an accusation of rape made by Borgström's clients in August 2010.
"He has really been grabbing at every straw, and frankly I don't understand why he is acting like this. Maybe he has had bad advisors," Borgström suggested of Assange's refusal until now to return to Sweden for questioning.
Assange's Swedish lawyer Björn Hurtig meanwhile said he was not surprised by Wednesday's verdict.
"This was not unexpected, but it was of course bad news for Assange," he told TT, adding he did not yet know if his client would appeal the verdict to Britain's Supreme Court.
Assange has 14 days to decide whether he will try to take the case to the highest legal authority in Britain.
Hurtig meanwhile insisted that Assange had never been unwilling to travel to Sweden, but that "he doesn't want to be taken into custody."
He also brushed aside vocal criticism since the case came to light of the Swedish judicial system, insisting it "generally holds a very high standard."
Petter Asp, a professor of criminal law at Stockholm University, agreed that most criticism of the Swedish legal system was based on a "misunderstanding" adding that Assange would "definitely" receive a fair trail should charges be filed.
"Lots of the discussion about Sweden's legal system has been based on misleading information," he told The Local in reference to claims made by Assange supporters that the criminal probe is simply a result of overly broad sex crime statutes in Sweden.
"We do have a concept of rape which is perhaps wider than the label applied in other countries," he said.
"But it's not a question of criminality. The offence would simply be called something else, be it assault, molestation or some other classification."
Comments
See Also
"They feel a certain degree of relief," lawyer Claes Borgström told the TT news agency shortly after Assange lost a bitter legal battle to block his extradition to Sweden.
"It has been very trying for them to live with this uncertainty, especially since they themselves have found themselves attacked," he said, referring to allegations spread especially on social media that the women's accusations were motivated by secret agendas aimed at bringing down WikiLeaks.
Two judges at the High Court in London rejected Wednesday arguments by the 40-year-old Australian, whose anti-secrecy website has enraged governments around the world, that his extradition would be unlawful.
Swedish prosecutors want to question Assange on suspicion of two counts of sexual molestation and an accusation of rape made by Borgström's clients in August 2010.
"He has really been grabbing at every straw, and frankly I don't understand why he is acting like this. Maybe he has had bad advisors," Borgström suggested of Assange's refusal until now to return to Sweden for questioning.
Assange's Swedish lawyer Björn Hurtig meanwhile said he was not surprised by Wednesday's verdict.
"This was not unexpected, but it was of course bad news for Assange," he told TT, adding he did not yet know if his client would appeal the verdict to Britain's Supreme Court.
Assange has 14 days to decide whether he will try to take the case to the highest legal authority in Britain.
Hurtig meanwhile insisted that Assange had never been unwilling to travel to Sweden, but that "he doesn't want to be taken into custody."
He also brushed aside vocal criticism since the case came to light of the Swedish judicial system, insisting it "generally holds a very high standard."
Petter Asp, a professor of criminal law at Stockholm University, agreed that most criticism of the Swedish legal system was based on a "misunderstanding" adding that Assange would "definitely" receive a fair trail should charges be filed.
"Lots of the discussion about Sweden's legal system has been based on misleading information," he told The Local in reference to claims made by Assange supporters that the criminal probe is simply a result of overly broad sex crime statutes in Sweden.
"We do have a concept of rape which is perhaps wider than the label applied in other countries," he said.
"But it's not a question of criminality. The offence would simply be called something else, be it assault, molestation or some other classification."
Join the conversation in our comments section below. Share your own views and experience and if you have a question or suggestion for our journalists then email us at [email protected].
Please keep comments civil, constructive and on topic – and make sure to read our terms of use before getting involved.
Please log in here to leave a comment.