Advertisement

Sweden's military gaffe exposes large gap

The Local/AFP
The Local/AFP - [email protected]
Sweden's military gaffe exposes large gap

Efforts to bulk up Sweden's military defense suffered another blow as the number of recruits was mistakenly inflated nine times the slim reality.

Advertisement

Sweden's military must explain an error in calculating the number of new recruits since mandatory military service was abandoned a year ago, the defence ministry said Friday.

Sweden's chiefs-of-staff recognised last week that they had erred in counting how many part-time recruits had signed up. The number was not 2,700 - as originally reported - but 300.

Defence Minister Sten Tolgfors is "very irritated by what happened" a spokeswoman said, adding that military head Sverker Goranson must fix the mistake.

In a report, the chiefs-of-staff admitted confusing the 300 actual recruits with the target of 2,700 for the period.

Since switching to a professional military, Sweden had set a goal of recruiting 6,600 new soldiers: 3,900 on a full-time basis and 2,700 part-time.

The new goal for part-timers has been reduced to 2,000 in order to make-up for the recruitment gap caused by the blunder.

The social-democratic opposition, who had opposed the end of mandatory military service, strongly criticised the government for its difficulty in recruiting.

"The government generally embellished the situation," Peter Helquist, who presides over the defence committee in parliament, told the AFP.

In July, newspaper Svenska Dagbladet reported that the Swedish military was having great difficulty meeting its recruitment targets. Several recruits had given up during or just after initial training, it said.

At the time, the chiefs-of-staff recognised that they might have to ease entry requirements for new recruits.

More

Join the conversation in our comments section below. Share your own views and experience and if you have a question or suggestion for our journalists then email us at [email protected].
Please keep comments civil, constructive and on topic – and make sure to read our terms of use before getting involved.

Please log in to leave a comment.

See Also